Legal Opinion
Blocker v. Conocophillips Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 6, 2019No. Case No. CIV-17-248-GPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant ConocoPhillips Company's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 131) filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In its Motion, Defendant seeks summary adjudication of Plaintiffs' claims of private nuisance, public nuisance, negligence, and unjust enrichment, as well as certain affirmative defenses. The Motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition. See Pls.' Resp. (Doc. No. 158); Def.'s Reply (Doc. No. 180).
STANDARD OF DECISION
Summary judgment is a means of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Self v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bristow First Assembly of God v. BP p.l.c.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Donehue v. Apache CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023