Legal Opinion

Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 31, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0260PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 The pivotal issue is whether the defendants are entitled to a new trial because the jury failed to allocate some degree of fault to a non-party, even though the parties stipulated that the non-party proximately caused the relevant injuries. Here, the jury disregarded the stipulation and apportioned 100% of fault to the party defendants. We hold that a jury must allocate some degree of fault to a stipulated non-party at fault. Accordingly, we remand for a new trial.

¶ 2 We must also decide if we should vacate the jury’s verdict in its entirety and remand for a trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cooter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Quintero v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Estate of Hanscome v. Evergreen at Foothills, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API