Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARBARINO, Judge.
¶ 1 The pivotal issue is whether the defendants are entitled to a new trial because the jury failed to allocate some degree of fault to a non-party, even though the parties stipulated that the non-party proximately caused the relevant injuries. Here, the jury disregarded the stipulation and apportioned 100% of fault to the party defendants. We hold that a jury must allocate some degree of fault to a stipulated non-party at fault. Accordingly, we remand for a new trial.
¶ 2 We must also decide if we should vacate the jury’s verdict in its entirety and remand for a trial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Cooter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Quintero v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Estate of Hanscome v. Evergreen at Foothills, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.