Legal Opinion

Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. Jackson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 01-0007PublishedCited by 1,162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Owen

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice SMITH, and Justice WAINWRIGHT joined.

In this case, we resolve how courts of appeals are to conduct a factual sufficiency review when 1) a jury is permitted to award damages for elements that somewhat overlap, 2) the jury is instructed not to duplicate an award for any particular loss, and 3) the jury awards no damages or *760damages that are allegedly inadequate for an element that could overlap with another.

Because the court of appeals in this case did not properly apply the standard of review set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Peek v. Equipment Service Co. of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1989

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,162 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Interest of H.R.M.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. HawleyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Andrew Anderson v. Jerry v. Durant, Jerry v. Durant, Inc. D/B/A Durant Toyota and D/B/A Jerry Durant Toyota, Jerry Durant Hyundai, LLC, Doyle Maynard, and Robert G. Cote, Sr., Gary Michael Deere, Jerry Rash, and Elliot "scooter" MichelsonTexas Supreme Court · 2018

1,157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API