Legal Opinion

Quintero v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 07-0698PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Elizabeth Quintero (“Quintero”), widow to and personal representative of the estate of Luis Anaya Soto (“Soto”), appeals summary judgment in favor of Matthew and Jane Doe Rodgers. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 This appeal arose from an automobile accident that occurred when Matthew Rodgers’ (“Rodgers”) vehicle collided with another vehicle, which then collided with Soto’s vehicle. 1 After Soto filed suit against Rodgers, Soto died in an unrelated workplace accident. The court granted Quintero’s motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Demetrulias v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  3. Newman v. Select Specialty Hospital-Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Manion v. Ameri-Can Freight Sys. Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  5. AMY PURDY v. HON. D. DOUGLAS METCALFCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API