Legal Opinion
Winnaman v. Cambria Community Services District
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1989No. B033898PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ABBE, J.
Appellant Frank L. Winnaman appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent Cambria Community Services District (CCSD) to provide water and sewage service to Winnaman’s development project for a connection charge of $3,840.08 rather than the $24,544.78 demanded by CCSD. We affirm.
Facts
The matter was tried upon facts stipulated by the parties. Winnaman planned to construct a “commercial service center” with buildings to be used for warehouse and storage, wholesale sales and services, contractors’ offices, auto repair and storage and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Associated Homebuilders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tosh v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- N.T. Hill Inc. v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- City of Moorpark v. Moorpark Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- F.D.R. Srour Partnership v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- North State Development Co. v. Pittsburg Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.