Legal Opinion

Sarringhaus v. City of Shelbyville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1971No. 171A19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

On October 8, 1968, the Common Council of the City of Shelbyville, Indiana, passed Ordinance No. 1463 purporting to annex certain territory. The Appellants filed a timely remonstrance. It is stipulated that Appellants-Remonstrators constituted a majority of the owners of land in the territory sought to be annexed or were owners of more than 75% of assessed valuation of the real estate in such territory.

After the trial on the remonstrance the trial court found for the City and against the remonstrators.

The evidence must be examined in the light most favorable to the Appellee-City.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. SMITH v. the Incorp. Town of Culver, Ind.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. ARNHOLT v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Baker v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Kleinknecht v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Annexation Ordinance No. X-21-68 v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Matter of Ordinance to Annex Certain TerritoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. LeMaster v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In re the Annexation Proposed By Annexation Ordinance Number X-06-91Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API