Legal Opinion

In re the Annexation Proposed By Annexation Ordinance Number X-06-91

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1994No. 02A03-9403-CV-129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

Walden area residents ("Remonstrators") appeal the trial court's order overruling their remonstrance to the city of Fort Wayne's ("City") proposed annexation of their neighborhood. Remonstrators present one issue for our review, which we separate into six and restate as follows:

I. Whether the City is statutorily precluded from implementing Annexation Ordinance X-06-91.

II. Whether the City's actions constitute harassment, bad faith or vexatious conduct precluding it from implementing the annexation ordinance.

III. Whether amendments to the proposed fiscal plan prior to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Indiana Department of Human Services v. FirthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. Windy City Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Ordinance to Annex Certain TerritoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API