Legal Opinion
Kleinknecht v. City of Evansville
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1965No. 19,804PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The appellants’ assignment of errors—
1. The court erred in overruling the- appellants’ motion for a new trial.
' 2. The court erred in not reopening said cause to hear evidence on newly discovered evidence material to the party applying, which appellants could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial.
The appellants have not discussed in the argument portion of appellants’ brief the second assigned error.
*347Accordingly, appellants have waived this specification of error. Rule 2-17 of the Supreme Court, 1964 Edition. McCracken v. Hunter et al. (1962), 134 Ind. App.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Silverstein v. Central Furniture Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Noyer, Exr. v. EckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Peckham v. SMITH, a MINOR, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Haley v. WILLIAMS, TRUSTEE ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sarringhaus v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Glenn v. Thatcher Glass Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kleinknecht v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kleinknecht v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Ross v. APPLE, D/B/A SHERIDAN AIRPORTIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.