Legal Opinion
ARNHOLT v. City of Columbus
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1957No. 18,733PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, C. J.
In the matter of the annexation of certain unincorporated territory, known as Mead Village, to the city of Columbus, Indiana, the Bartholomew Circuit Court, on February 10, 1955, entered the following finding and judgment:
“ . . . the Court now being duly advised in the premises finds that less than 51% of the persons owning property in the territory (Mead Village) sought to be annexed by Ordinance Number 1592, 1954, of the City of Columbus, Indiana, passed by the Common Council thereof on March 1, 1954, have remonstrated and that the adding of such territory to the City of Columbus will be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Stilz v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Pence v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Chandler v. City of KokomoIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Paul v. Town of WalkertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Montagana v. City of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. PersingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- DOAN v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.