Legal Opinion
S.F. Exam'r Div. v. Sweat
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1967No. Civ. No. 22986PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
San Francisco Examiner Division, Hearst Publishing Company, Inc. (Examiner), cross-complainant below, appeals from an order granting a motion for summary judgment and from the judgment entered thereupon in favor of William Sweat (Sweat) and Eldorado Insurance Exchange, respondents here and cross-defendants below.1
The uncontested facts may be briefly summarized. Sweat was engaged as a route manager for the Examiner, a daily *495newspaper. In the course of his duties, which required him to distribute the Examiner’s newspapers, he employed newsboys to whom he delivered bundles of papers. Sweat…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Aetna Life and Casualty Co. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.