Legal Opinion
Lima v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 5, 1982No. LUBA 80-127, CA A21275PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Petitioners appeal an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirming the zoning designation of petitioners’ property in the Jackson County comprehensive plan. Petitioners contend that LUBA erred by applying to their appeal the standard of review for legislative actions rather than the broader review standard for quasi-judicial actions; specifically, petitioners claim that a zoning decision which was incorporated in the comprehensive plan is reviewable for substantial evidence and for the other components required in quasi-judicial proceedings. The county’s comprehensive plan and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Woodcock v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Carmel Estates, Inc. v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Miller v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Benjfran Development, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Stewart v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982