Legal Opinion

Unah by and Through Unah v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1984No. 53387PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA D. WILSON, Justice.

This appeal presents us with the opportunity to review our adherence to the rule of parental immunity which bars an unemanci-pated minor child from bringing an action for ordinary negligence against his parent.1

In this case, Nathan Unah, an unemanci-pated minor child, was injured in an automobile accident allegedly caused by the combined negligence of his father, defendant Freeland Unah, and defendant A.F. Martin. Nathan, by and through his mother and next friend, Mary Jane Unah, and Mary Jane Unah, individually, brought this action to recover for personal injuries…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Lewis R. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Winn v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API