Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Estate of McKenney v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2005No. 03AP-1196Published

1DissentLazarus, Judge

{¶ 20} Being unable to agree with the majority, I respectfully dissent.

{¶ 21} I believe recent Ohio Supreme Court precedent supports the magistrate’s decision in this case. Specifically, R.C. 4123.60 allows dependents to collect compensation that had accrued but had not been paid to an employee prior to death. In State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 276, 737 N.E.2d 519, the Supreme Court of Ohio allowed the estate of the decedent to collect his accrued R.C. 4123.60 compensation. In State ex rel. Nossal v. Terex Div. of I.B.H. (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 175, 712 N.E.2d 747,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bozzelli v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Latino v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API