Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1924No. 18205PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in mandamus filed in this court under the original jurisdiction of the court, seeking to compel the Industrial Commission to continue biweekly payments under an award. The controversy grows out of the following facts and circumstances:

One George Morton, an employe, was injured in the course of his employment, resulting in his death. Relator's decedent was the wife of the said George Morton, and she was living with him at the time of his death, and was wholly dependent upon him for support. After the death of George Morton, an award of the full amount due was made to the…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Arrington v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Northwestern Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API