Legal Opinion

United States v. Grand Rapids, Michigan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 11, 2000No. 1:99CV388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

The United States of America, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), filed this action under sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606 & 9607, to address the environmental cleanup of the Butterworth No. 2 Landfill Superfund Site (“Site”) in Grand Rapids, Michigan. On March 30, 2000, the EPA filed a motion for entry of the proposed Consent Decree that was lodged with the Court on May 21, 1999. The Proposed Consent Decree has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  3. United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Atlas Lederer Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Paddock Enterprises, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. Secretary of U.S. Department of Labor v. Azteca Restaurante Mexicano, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. United States v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API