Legal Opinion

United States v. Atlas Lederer Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 13, 2005No. 3:91cv309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION TO ENTER PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE (DOC. #621)

RICE, District Judge.

This litigation arises under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Plaintiff United States of America has settled its claims with the members of the United Scrap Lead Respondent Group (“Respondent Group”). Pursuant to § 107(a) and § 113(f) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) and § 9613(f), the United States and the Respondent Group now seek to recover the costs they have incurred to remediate environmental…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API