United States v. Atlas Lederer Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION TO ENTER PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE (DOC. #621)
RICE, District Judge.
This litigation arises under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Plaintiff United States of America has settled its claims with the members of the United Scrap Lead Respondent Group (“Respondent Group”). Pursuant to § 107(a) and § 113(f) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) and § 9613(f), the United States and the Respondent Group now seek to recover the costs they have incurred to remediate environmental…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020