Legal Opinion

United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 9, 1996No. 95-1961, 95-1984 and 95-2019PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

The clean-up of a Superfund hazardous waste site in New Bedford, Massachusetts is largely being accomplished and funded through agreements the government has reached with private parties who bear some legal responsibility for the wastes at the site. Those agreements, by law, must be approved by the United States Courts as being fair, reasonable, and consistent with the purposes of CERCLA, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. Multiples of millions of dollars are involved in these settlements and the stakes are high, both for the public…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. John Wyeth & Brother Limited v. Cigna International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Amego, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Millipore Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. United States of America, in 95-1987. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Consolidated Rail Corporation, in 95-1988Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API