Legal Opinion

Rullman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1970No. Civ. 12159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, J.

A widow sues for the death indemnity provided by her husband’s automobile insurance policy. The trial court sustained her claim and the insurer appeals.

Four clauses of the policy are significant in determining coverage. The death indemnity clause provided for payment “ ... in event of the death of each insured which shall result directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury caused by accident and sustained by the insured while occupying or through being struck by an automobile, provided the death shall occur within 90 days from the date of such accident.”

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hendricks v. American Employers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Hardee v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Castro v. Fireman's Fund American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Reserve InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Jaramillo v. Mercury InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API