Roberts v. State

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

The central issue in this appeal concerns the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress certain evidence which was allegedly obtained in violation of both section 60S of the Federal Communications Act 1 and Alaska’s wiretap and eavesdropping statutes. 2 We sustain the lower court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress.

At the suppression hearing which was held prior to trial, the following pertinent evidence was developed:

Mrs. Nema Marine lived with her husband and family on Turnagain Boulevard in Anchorage, Alaska since August 1966. In September of…