Legal Opinion

Ohio Cultivator Co. v. Dunkin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1917No. 7134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Suit by ,the Ohio Cultivator Companjy against J. W. Dunkin and A. L. Walker. Judgment for defendants, and) plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBRlETT, J.

In, January,' 1911, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sold to the defendants in error, defendants 'beldw, certain farm implements on time. On November 28, 1911, the plaintiff sent a representative to the defendants’ place of business at Wau-rika, to make settlement with the defendants. After determining the amount that was due the plaintiff, the defendants executed and delivered their several notes payable January, February, April, and November, ■ 1913, in settlement of the account. Without .the knowledge or consent of defendants, all of the notes were altered so as to make them fall due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Webb v. National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Craddock v. DwightMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bond v. McMahonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Tulsa Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Oklahoma City v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Giant Powder Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Colvert v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API