Legal Opinion

Webb v. National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

This was an action 'in replevin by E. T. Webb and William A. Wilson, claiming as mortgagees, against the National Bank of the Republic and Alexander Hurd, to recover possession of 780 yearling calves. At the conclusion of the evidence the court instructed the jury to find for the defendants, upon which finding judgment was accordingly ren- - dered.

It appears that on October 14, 1899, Frank Sigel owned 2300 cows and 100 Hereford bulls branded “F.” These cattle were on a ranch in Meade county, Kansas. On that date Sigel caused an employee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Wylly v. S. Z. Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. First Nat. Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Kermeyer v. NewbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Topeka Capital Co. v. MerriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mentzer v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Niotaze State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Ohio Cultivator Co. v. DunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Badger Lumber & Coal Co. v. GrubeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Gibbs v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API