Legal Opinion

Craddock v. Dwight

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Proceedings under log-lien law of 1887. Defendants bring error. The' facts are stated in the opinion. ■

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This suit was brought to enforce a lien under Act No. 229, Lalvs of 1887.

Plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendants running from January 1, 1887, to January 1, 1888, by which he agreed to manufacture shingles for the defendants from their lumber at $1 per M. for 14 inch, $1.10 per M. for 16 and 18 inch, $0.40 per M. for culls, $0.35 per M. additional for fancy butts, and $0.20 per M. for diamond, octagon, and other similar shapes. At the expiration of the year there was a verbal renewal of the contract. He filed his statement of lien March 6, 1889, stating that the last day's…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Noyes v. HillierMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fields v. Daisy Gold Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sullivan v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hughes v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Germain v. Central Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hammond v. PullmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API