Craddock v. Dwight
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Proceedings under log-lien law of 1887. Defendants bring error. The' facts are stated in the opinion. ■
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This suit was brought to enforce a lien under Act No. 229, Lalvs of 1887.
Plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendants running from January 1, 1887, to January 1, 1888, by which he agreed to manufacture shingles for the defendants from their lumber at $1 per M. for 14 inch, $1.10 per M. for 16 and 18 inch, $0.40 per M. for culls, $0.35 per M. additional for fancy butts, and $0.20 per M. for diamond, octagon, and other similar shapes. At the expiration of the year there was a verbal renewal of the contract. He filed his statement of lien March 6, 1889, stating that the last day's…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Noyes v. HillierMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fields v. Daisy Gold Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
- Sullivan v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Hughes v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Germain v. Central Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Hammond v. PullmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.