Legal Opinion

Bond v. McMahon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Daboll, J.,' presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Tbe plaintiffs recovered a judgment *558on a declaration alleging a promise on the part of defendant to pay plaintiffs a debt owing to them by one Toohey. Defendant brings error.

1. The declaration averred a promise by defendant in consideration of the release of Toohey by plaintiffs. Defendant’s testimony tended to show that on the occasion when the alleged promise of defendant, and the simultaneous release of Toohey, occurred, defendant gave to plaintiffs an order on the Northwestern Water & Gas Supply Company, covering the amount, upon which order only a portion was paid, leaving a balance'…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Colgrove v. GoodyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Abbott v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ohio Cultivator Co. v. DunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API