Legal Opinion

Dye v. Witco Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.

in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK and GARY R. WADE, JJ., and D. MICHAEL SWINEY, Sp.J., joined.

The trial court granted summary judgment to the employer in this workers’ compensation case, finding that the statute of limitations bars the employee’s claim and that the savings statute provides no relief to the employee. We hold that the employee’s complaint for workers’ compensation benefits is barred by the statute of limitations. We further hold that the employee failed to file his complaint within the time allowed by the savings statute. Accordingly, we affirm the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cronin v. HoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Black v. BlountTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Norton v. McCaskillTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lay v. Scott County Sheriff's DepartmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Berry v. Consolidated Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Green v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Sandra L. Wallis v. Brainerd Baptist ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Schneider v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API