Norton v. McCaskill
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine the time frame within which a lessee must exercise the option to renew a lease that does not designate a specific time frame for renewal but requires that the option be exercised “at the end of’ or “at the termination of’ the original lease term. We have concluded that in the absence of a specific time designation in the lease, an option to renew remains effective only during the term of the lease. Accordingly, when a lease merely stipulates that it must be renewed at the end of its term, the lessee must exercise the option on or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Lawrence Ex Rel. Powell v. StanfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Downen v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Waggoner Motors, Inc. v. Waverly Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Ellis v. Pauline S. Sprouse Residuary TrustTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Dye v. Witco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- SDG MacErich Properties, L.P. v. Stanek Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.