Lay v. Scott County Sheriff's Department
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,
delivered the opinion of the court,
in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.
OPINION
The primary issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether the attainment of maximum medical improvement is a necessary factor in determining whether there has been a meaningful return to work under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241. The trial court found that since the pre-injury employer returned the employee to work at a lower wage than his pre-injury wage, Section 50-6 — 241(a)(1) did not apply, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Davis v. ReaganTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Carter v. First Source Furniture GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Newton v. Scott Health Care CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Smith v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tryon v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Dye v. Witco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Nichols v. JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Dixon v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.