Legal Opinion

Lay v. Scott County Sheriff's Department

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003No. E2002-01731-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

OPINION

The primary issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether the attainment of maximum medical improvement is a necessary factor in determining whether there has been a meaningful return to work under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241. The trial court found that since the pre-injury employer returned the employee to work at a lower wage than his pre-injury wage, Section 50-6 — 241(a)(1) did not apply, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Davis v. ReaganTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carter v. First Source Furniture GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Newton v. Scott Health Care CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Smith v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tryon v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dye v. Witco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nichols v. JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Dixon v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API