Legal Opinion

Caddock v. Hy-Meg Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 31, 1987No. 86 C 6013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Richard E. Caddock and Cad-dock Electronics, Inc. bring this patent infringement action against defendants HyMeg Corporation, Gregory Rebchook and Vincent Cupidro. Plaintiffs allege that a resistor made and sold by the Hy-Meg Corporation (“Hy-Meg resistor”) infringes on plaintiffs’ patent of a non-inductive film-type cylindrical resistor (“Caddock resistor”). Defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

I

Summary judgment is appropriate only where the moving party demonstrates that no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kasper v. Cooper Canada Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API