Legal Opinion

Mungo v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2001No. 98-CM-1018PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Senior Judge:

Following a bench trial, the trial judge found appellant Lonnie Mungo not guilty of three charged counts of misdemeanor sexual abuse (“MSA”), see D.C.Code § 22-4106 (1996), but guilty of two counts of simple assault, see D.C.Code § 22-504, under the lesser-ineluded offense doctrine. Mungo raises three related arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial judge, sua sponte, improperly considered the lesser-ineluded offenses. Second, Mungo asserts that simple assault is not a lesser-ineluded offense of MSA. Finally, he urges that the evidence presented at trial was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Williamson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Rease v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. A.R. v. F.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Ellison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API