Mungo v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Senior Judge:
Following a bench trial, the trial judge found appellant Lonnie Mungo not guilty of three charged counts of misdemeanor sexual abuse (“MSA”), see D.C.Code § 22-4106 (1996), but guilty of two counts of simple assault, see D.C.Code § 22-504, under the lesser-ineluded offense doctrine. Mungo raises three related arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the trial judge, sua sponte, improperly considered the lesser-ineluded offenses. Second, Mungo asserts that simple assault is not a lesser-ineluded offense of MSA. Finally, he urges that the evidence presented at trial was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Williamson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rease v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- A.R. v. F.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ellison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.