Minehan v. Silveria
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
The record, on this appeal, consists of the judgment-roll. The complaint alleges that three defendants, named therein, to wit, a copartnership and its two partners were indebted to plaintiffs in the sum-of $1993.45 for goods sold and delivered. The three defendants filed a joint general demurrer, of which no disposition is shown. Subsequently the two copartners answered, in two inconsistent counts, denying any indebtedness and admitting an indebtedness of $344. The court found “that defendants are indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $343.55, . . . That defendants have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- John Bollman Co. v. S. Bachman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hawley Bros. Hardware Co. v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Landon White Bail BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nicholls v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Ampuero v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Joseph Magnin Co. v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.