Legal Opinion

Minehan v. Silveria

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1933No. Docket No. 8803PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The record, on this appeal, consists of the judgment-roll. The complaint alleges that three defendants, named therein, to wit, a copartnership and its two partners were indebted to plaintiffs in the sum-of $1993.45 for goods sold and delivered. The three defendants filed a joint general demurrer, of which no disposition is shown. Subsequently the two copartners answered, in two inconsistent counts, denying any indebtedness and admitting an indebtedness of $344. The court found “that defendants are indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $343.55, . . . That defendants have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. John Bollman Co. v. S. Bachman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Hawley Bros. Hardware Co. v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Landon White Bail BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Nicholls v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Ampuero v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Joseph Magnin Co. v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API