Legal Opinion
People v. Landon White Bail Bonds
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1991No. A051405PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
This appeal from an order in a bail forfeiture proceeding raises two issues: (1) May a bail bond agent be held liable in a summary judgment of bail forfeiture under Penal Code section 1306? (2) May a summary judgment of bail forfeiture be amended more than 90 days after the day it could first be entered, in order to explicitly state that it is rendered against the surety as well as against the bail agent? We will conclude that a summary judgment purporting to name a mere bail agent as a judgment debtor is, to that extent, void on the face of the record, but that under the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Rose v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Smith v. Ogbuehi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.