Legal Opinion

Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Wagner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1896No. 1,880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

Appellee sued to recover for the death of his decedent, appellant’s servant, who lost his life through its negligence.

It is charged in the complaint that the decedent was, when employed by appellant, without experience or training as a brakeman, of which fact appellant was informed; that appellant operated a gravel train, the cars of which were provided with aprons at each end consisting of a plank platform, being really an extension of the floor of the car, by means of which, when the cars were coupled, there was formed a continuous floor without any open space between the cars; that these…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WitteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Holt v. RockhillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bowles v. Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. PressellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Clark County Cement Co. v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Guedelhofer v. ErnstingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API