Legal Opinion

Guedelhofer v. Ernsting

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1899No. 2,698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

This was an action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for an injury received, while in the employment of appellant, caused by the alleged negligence of the latter. The complaint, which is in one paragraph, avers that appellant owned and operated a factory, and was engaged in manufacturing and repairing wagons and other vehicles; that in carrying on said business, appellant had and used machinery of various kinds, which was propelled by steam; that a part of such machinery consisted of a jointer, constructed with an iron or steel top or table, about six feet long and about one…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Hickey v. . TaaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Crown v. . OrrNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buehner Chair Co. v. FeulnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Langlois v. Dunn Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
  3. Lowden v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Corning Steel Co. v. PohlplatzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Ohio Valley Coffin Co. v. GobleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API