Legal Opinion

Kraemer v. Harding

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. 941891; CA A97884PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on his claims for defamation, intentional interference with economic relations and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion for a directed verdict on each claim, its submission of the punitive damages issue to the jury, its instructions to the jury on that issue and its failure to reduce the punitive damage award. We affirm.

We state the evidence introduced at trial in the light most favorable to plaintiff. See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705, 688 P2d 811…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. House v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Snyder v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  4. Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Wieber v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API