Legal Opinion

House v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 2008No. 160511743; A130796PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*350SERCOMBE, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs claims for defamation, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress (IIED), and deprivation of liberty based on 42 USC section 1983. We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on the IIED claim. We reject without discussion plaintiffs remaining claims of error regarding the court’s rulings on the untimeliness of the defamation claim and the sufficiency of the civil rights claim.

Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party demonstrates that there is no genuine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Pakos v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Justice v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  2. Estate of Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Utah County v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wasatch County v. OkelberryUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. McLean v. Pine Eagle School District, No. 61District Court, D. Oregon · 2016

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API