Legal Opinion
Williamson v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 2007PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
We are asked to determine whether the continuous representation doctrine applies to toll the limitations period applicable to plaintiffs auditing malpractice claims against defendant. In the circumstances presented, we conclude that it does not.
Facts and Procedural History
Lipper Convertibles and Lipper Fixed Income Fund (collectively, the Funds) were private investment limited partnerships (hedge funds) managed by Lipper Holdings (Management). Lip-per Convertibles’ primary asset was a portfolio of convertible securities. Lipper Fixed Income invested approximately…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lawrence v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Maya NY, LLC v. HaglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cusimano v. SchnurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.