Legal Opinion
Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1992PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alexander, J.
In this action for legal malpractice and breach of contract, plaintiff Martin Santulli and defendant law firm Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C. each appeal, by leave of the Appellate Division, from an order of that court. The Appellate Division modified Supreme Court’s order by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff’s breach of contract cause of action as legally insufficient and affirming that court’s denial of defendant’s motion, addressed to plaintiff’s malpractice claim, for summary judgment based on Statute of Limitations…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Baratta v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lenard v. Design StudioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Dormitory Auth. of N.Y. v. Samson Constr. Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.