Legal Opinion

McKee v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1963No. Civ. 20412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiff McKee appeals from the judgment herein in favor of defendant Peterson and awarding defendant Peterson costs against plaintiff. Defendant Clementson appeals from that portion of the judgment awarding plaintiff $4,975 against defendants Clementson, Butler, and Furst. Defendants Butler and Furst do not appeal.

Questions Presented

Plaintiff’s Appeal.

1. Where a mortgagee relies upon documentary indicia of ownership of an automobile supplied by the seller, but without possession of the automobile, is the seller estopped to claim ownership against the mortgagee?

2. May defendant Peterson…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Stoody v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. English v. Ralph Williams FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Jessup v. Cattle Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Pearl v. ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API