Legal Opinion
Claim of Szabo v. Standard Commercial Body Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, P. J.
The insurance carrier contends that the accident in question was not covered by the policy it issued to the employer. The business of the employer was manufacturing automobile bodies. It had three plants for the construction of such bodies, one in the borough of Manhattan, one in the borough of Brooklyn, and one in Kearny, in the State of New Jersey. Its office and principal place of business was in the borough of Manhattan. At the Kearny plant as at the others the finished product was turned out and distributed therefrom. Operations at that plant were independent of either of the others and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Pettit v. RegesNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Neubeck v. DoscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Claim of Hammele v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- American Employers Insurance v. Goble Aircraft Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Williams v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Continental Casualty Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Schwartz v. Sar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.