Claim of Hammele v. McMahon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The contest on this appeal is between the employer and insurance carrier. The award was made against both. The carrier now seeks to avoid liability on the ground that the policy had been canceled. The employer is the party chiefly interested. No notice of appeal has been served on or is addressed to the employer.
There is also here a reprehensible practice. The attorneys who are prosecuting the appeal for the carrier are the same who defended against the claim for the employer before the Industrial Board. Now, without notice to the employer, they are seeking to avoid liability on the part of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Szabo v. Standard Commercial Body Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Longwell Lumber & Building Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Claim of Boos v. BoosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927