Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Sar Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis J. Friedman, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment striking out the answer of the defendants and setting the matter down for assessment of damages. By order to show cause, and as a cross motion, defendants move to amend their answer, so that it will contain a denial of one of the paragraphs of plaintiff’s complaint in which it is alleged that defendants *661were negligent and plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. Defendants assert that they erroneously failed to deny this paragraph when the original answer was served.
The action is brought in negligence to recover for personal injuries sustained by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- American Employers Insurance v. Goble Aircraft Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Dodwell & Co. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Richard Walker, Dorothy WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Trieber v. HopsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Graci v. DenaroNew York Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.