Legal Opinion
Neubeck v. Doscher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hasbrouck, J.:
The sole question in this case is whether the New Amsterdam Casualty Company carried the risk under the Workmen’s Compensation Law covering the injury and death of George Neubeck, employee of John Doscher.
Neubeck was killed in Brooklyn, N. Y., on January 2, 1921, and the appellant insurance carrier has paid compensation to his widow and son up to the present time.
*618The decision contains a provision that the employer secured compensation to all his employees by the universal standard workmen’s compensation policy issued by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company. That policy was issued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gans v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bahr v. National Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Claim of Hargraves v. George F. Shevlin Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Astrin v. East New York Woodwork Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Claim of Szabo v. Standard Commercial Body Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Allen v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.