Hoffman v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan, and Theo. J. Roche, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to pronounce a judgment in a case presented to that court for determination.
The petitioner instituted a proceeding under the provisions of the act approved June 16, 1906, for the establishment and quieting of title to real estate in case of a loss or destruction of the public records, commonly known as the “McEnerney Act.” (Stats. 1906, p. 78.) The proceeding was numbered 125 in said court and was entitled “Robert 0. Hoffman, plaintiff, v. All persons claiming any interest in or lien upon the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Blakeslee v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.