Legal Opinion
Eastham v. Santa Clara Elementary School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1969No. Civ. 25020PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
Santa Clara Unified School District appeals from a judgment directing issuance of a writ of mandate compelling the district to apply its salary schedule for certificated personnel to two school nurses.
Alice Niles and Sylvia Eastham, respondents before us, were first employed by the district in 1950 and 1954, respectively. Each completed a three-year probationary period and became a permanent employee of the district in the position of school nurse. Both hold credentials required for this position (Ed. Code, § 13197) and have continued in that employment to the present time.
Prom the time…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rible v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Cullen v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- San Diego Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Council of Directors & Supervisors v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- California Teachers Assn. v. IngwersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Edwards v. Alhambra Elementary School District 63Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Sayre v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.