Legal Opinion

Townsend v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1975No. Civ. 44591PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

This case involves the problem of mandatory retirement imposed upon a public employee. The employee is a deputy public defender; the employer is the County of Los Angeles, which in January 1969 adopted a pension plan that requires county employees to retire at age 65.

Plaintiff Vince Monroe Townsend, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Los Angeles County and related defendants.

Facts

Plaintiff was employed by Los Angeles County as a deputy public defender starting in February 1965. He was a civil service employee. He claims that'when he was hired,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rittenband v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. O'NEIL v. BaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Hetherington v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Ensworth v. MullvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API