Townsend v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
This case involves the problem of mandatory retirement imposed upon a public employee. The employee is a deputy public defender; the employer is the County of Los Angeles, which in January 1969 adopted a pension plan that requires county employees to retire at age 65.
Plaintiff Vince Monroe Townsend, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Los Angeles County and related defendants.
Facts
Plaintiff was employed by Los Angeles County as a deputy public defender starting in February 1965. He was a civil service employee. He claims that'when he was hired,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rittenband v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- O'NEIL v. BaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Hetherington v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ensworth v. MullvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.