Legal Opinion

Skolny v. Hillman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action" for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against Sidney Hillman, individually and as general president of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, an unincorporated association, and against Jacob S. Potofsky, individually and as assistant general secretary of the said association. Many other parties are joined as defendants in the summons and caption of the complaint, but the two persons mentioned alone were served and the action is being prosecuted solely against them up to this time. A brief synopsis of the material facts alleged in the complaint follows: Plaintiffs are manufacturers of men’s and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Rourke v. Elk Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Sultan v. Star Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Heitkamper v. HoffmannNew York Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolivian Panama Hat Co. v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pre' Catelan, Inc. v. International Federation of WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API