Pre' Catelan, Inc. v. International Federation of Workers
New York Supreme Court
Motion to continue an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.
The moving papers show that plaintiff is engaged in the restaurant business in which it has invested upwards of $100,000. Its rent is about $25,000 yearly; it employs approximately 100 persons in different capacities, among them a large number of waiters; that it has always maintained an “ open shop ” and never discriminated against union labor; that the head waiter hired the employees. On February 13, 1921, at about ten p. m. while the restaurant was crowded with patrons who had given their orders but had not yet been served, all the waiters without cause or grievance therefor suddenly and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Beck v. Railway Teamsters' Protective UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolivian Panama Hat Co. v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- United Traction Co. v. DrooganNew York Supreme Court · 1921