Heitkamper v. Hoffmann
New York Supreme Court
Action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtCallaghan, J.
The plaintiff conducts a bake shop at the corner of Grove street and Knickerbocker avenue in the borough of Brooklyn. It is known as an open shop, inasmuch as the plaintiff does not employ bakers who are members of the union.
Representatives of the Journeymans Bakers Union, one of the defendants here, called upon plaintiff on two occasions and urged him to unionize his shop. He refused. Upon such refusal one of the representatives of the union stated to plaintiff that ‘ ‘ where there is a will there is a way. ’ ’ Thereupon the union set upon a plan to force the plaintiff to comply with its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- McCabe v. . GoodfellowNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People Ex Rel. Stearns v. . MarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Mills v. United States Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Foster v. Retail Clerks' International Protective Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cavanagh v. HutchesonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. EpsteanNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918
- Bobe v. LloydsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Skolny v. HillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Levine v. SchwimmerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.