Williams v. Youtz
California Supreme Court
The facts ar-e stated in the opinion of the court. Harriman, Ryckman & Tuttle, and Henry W. Nisbet, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
T his is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action is one to recover a balance alleged to be due upon eleven promissory notes, each for the sum of one thousand dollars," executed in the course of a single transaction by the plaintiff and each secured by a pledge of certain stock. Each of said notes contained the following provision: “That the Merchants and Insurers Reporting Company, has the right to call for such additional security as it may deem proper, and on failure to respond forthwith to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Todhunter v. KlemmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Williams v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Davies v. SymmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Bank of United States v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Permalab-Metalab Equipment Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.