Legal Opinion
Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Goldstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1938No. Civ. 5917PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant, J. Oscar Goldstein, has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him in a suit to foreclose a trust deed executed to secure the payment of a promissory note of even date therewith for the sum of $3,682.54 and interest.
The appellant contends he is not liable for payment of this note because he was not the owner of the property, but held title thereto merely as trustee for his client who was the real owner of the land; that the note and trust deed were given without consideration as a mere accommodation to the bank and to the owner of the lot, together with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Braselton v. VokalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hollywood National Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.