Legal Opinion

Williams v. Parker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1916No. Civ. No. 1709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

On July 1, 1908, defendant Parker executed in favor of the Merchants and Insurers Reporting Conlpany, a corporation, a so-called promissory note for the principal sum of one thousand dollars, bearing interest, and payable on or before five years after date. The note recited the fact of deposit with the payee of one hundred shares of stock in said corporation as security for the payment of the obligation. It was further provided therein “that the Merchants and Insurers Reporting Company has the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hudgens v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cohn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlantic National Bank of Boston v. KorrickArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Tracy v. Stock Assurance BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Williams v. YoutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Kieselhorst Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. California Bank v. DanielArizona Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API